In 2007, power consumption
reached 1,003 billion KWh nationwide, an increase of 2.3 percent on 2006.
Over 98 percent of all electricity output (985.6 billion kWh) was
consumed in the areas of centralized electricity supply, i.e. in the areas of operation of
the seven integrated energy systems and isolated energy systems of the Far East of Russia.
The three major integrated energy systems—Urals IES, Center IES, and
Siberia IES—consumed 692.6 billion kWh, or more than 70.3 percent of Russia's total
electricity use. In 2007, electricity use in the North-West IES, the Middle-Volga IDES,
and the South IES amounted to 253.6 kWh, or 25.7 percent, with the East IES consuming 39.4
billion kWh, or 4 percent of all electricity consumed in the UES of Russia.
In year-on-year terms, electricity consumption grew most rapidly in the
Urals IES (up 2.9 percent), the South IES (up 2.7 percent), and the North-West IES (up 2.6
percent). The electricity use in the Middle-Volga IES, the Siberia IES, the Center IES,
and the East IES grew 2.2 percent, 2 percent, 1.9 percent, and 0.8 percent, respectively.
Among the regions of Russia where electricity consumption grew
significantly were Moscow and the Moscow Region (3.4 percent), Republic of Udmurtia (6.0
percent), Rostov Region (3.3 percent), Novgorod Region (4.5 percent), Stavropol Region
(4.0 percent), Saint-Petersburg and the Leningrad Region (up 4.1 percent), Sverdlovsk
Region (up 3.1 percent), Chelyabinsk Region (2.9 percent), Chechen Republic (10.3
percent), and Republic of Khakassia (20.4 percent).
2007 saw increased demand for electricity from the less
energy-intensive manufacturing sectors, primarily, the machine-building industry. By way
of comparison, the surge in electricity consumption in 2006 was mostly due to the
increased domestic demand for products of energy-intensive heavy manufacturing sectors
such as metallurgy, manufacture of metalware, oil refining, chemical industry, and
manufacture of non-metal mineral products, as well as the oil and gas sector.
In 2007, the Russian Federation generated 1,015.9 billion kWh of
electricity.
In the areas of centralized electricity supply, the electricity
generation to meet the power use (including 11.7 billion kWh of net electricity exports)
amounted to 997.3 billion kWh, up 1.9 percent on 2006. Nuclear power plants, hydropower
plants, and thermal power plants generated 158.3 billion kWh (up 2.4 percent year on
year), 177.7 billion kWh (up 2.1 percent year on year), and 611.7 billion kWh (up 1.5
percent year on year) of electricity, respectively. The power plants supplying electricity
to retail markets generated 49.6 billion kWh in 2007 (up 5.3 percent on 2006).
MASTER PLAN FOR THE SITING OF ENERGY FACILITIES AND SYSTEM OF POWER
BALANCE FORECASTS
In 2007, on the commission of the Russian Government, the Ministry of
Industry and Energy of the Russian Federation with the participation of OAO RAO "UES
of Russia", FGUP "Rosenergoatom Concern", OAO "Gazprom", OAO
"Russian Railways", and coal companies developed the Master Plan for the Siting
of Energy Facilities until 2020 based on the long-term forecast. Among the drafters of the
Master Plan was ZAO "Agency for Power Balance Forecasting" (APBE).
Under the Master Plan, the key priority in the long-term development of
generation, in line with the Government's policy, is to achieve an optimum fuel balance in
the electricity industry by maximizing the potential for the development of the nuclear,
hydro-, and coal generation sectors.
In 2006-2020, the total amount of investments needed for expansion of
the electricity industry according to the base-case scenario will make about RUB20.7
trillion in current prices.
The principal provisions of the Master Plan were reviewed and approved
at meetings held in all the Federal Districts of Russian with the involvement of regional
executive authorities and administrations of the Presidential Plenipotentiaries in the
Federal Districts.
The amounts of coal to be produced for the needs of the electricity
industry, as well as the sites for new coal-fired power plants were agreed with Russia's
major coal companies. The amounts of natural gas needed for the expansion of gas-fired
power plants were basically agreed with OAO "Gazprom".
The part of the Master Plan relating to the required volumes of coal
freight was correlated with the action plan to develop the rail transportation system as
envisaged in the Strategy of Development of the Rail Transport in the Russian Federation
until 2030.
The Master Plan was approved in the Russian Government's Order No. 215r
of 22 February 2008.
FORECAST BALANCE SYSTEMS
Since 2002, RAO "UES of Russia" has used a regular model for
preparing medium-term forecasts for the development of energy companies and the aggregate
medium-term projected balance for the electricity industry. Since 2005, this work has been
done by ZAO "Agency for Power Balance Forecasting". In 2007, The Agency
completed preparing the Forecast Balance of the Electricity Industry for the Period Until
2010.
The Agency started a new-format forecast activity, viz. development of
the Projected Balance for the Electricity Industry for 2008-2015, which will be used to
monitor the progress in implementing the Master Plan.
The first part of the Projected Balance for the electricity industry
for 2008-2015, which includes the projected electricity consumption and projected balance
of capacity, was approved by Chairman of the Management Board of RAO "UES of
Russia" Anatoly Chubais on 11 March 2008.
The projected electricity consumption was prepared assuming two
different scenarios, the best-case and the moderate-case scenario. The best-case scenario
of projected electricity demand provides that 1,163 billion kWh of electricity will be
consumed nationwide in 2010, 1,408 billion kWh in 2015, with the electricity demand
growing by an average of 4.3 percent annually in 2008-2015. The moderate-case scenario
envisages electricity consumption of 1,120 billion kWh nationwide in 2010, 1,340 billion
kWh in 2015 with the electricity demand growing by an average of 3.7 percent annually in
2008-2015.
To accommodate the projected domestic electricity consumption, taking
into account electricity exports, by 2010 electricity generation in the areas of
centralized electricity supply in Russia should exceed 1,159 billion kWh assuming the
best-case scenario and 1,119 billion kWh assuming the moderate-case scenario. By 2015, the
electricity demand will grow to 1,431 billion kWh (best-case scenario) or 1,365 billion
kWh (moderate-case scenario).
Taking into account the electricity to be generated by the NPP as
projected by FGUP "Rosenergoatom Concern" (175 billion kWh in 2010 and 257
billion kWh in â 2015) and the long-term average annual generation by the HPPs (173
billion kWh in 2010 and 199 billion kWh in 2015), and the electricity generation by TPPs
in 2010 will make 771-811 billion kWh, and in 2015 908-974 billion kWh, depending on the
electricity consumption scenario.
The total demand for installed capacity of power plants in the area of
centralized electricity supply will grow to 239 GW in 2010 and to 286 GW in 2015 for the
best-case scenario, and, for the moderate-case scenario, to 232 GW in 2010, and to 275 GW
by 2015.
The areas of the Center IES, Urals IES, and Siberia IES account for the
greater part of the aggregate demand for installed capacity.
Taking into account the plans of generation companies and independent
energy producers relating to decommissioning and commissioning of generation facilities,
the installed capacity of Russia's power plants in the area of centralized electricity
supply in 2008-2015 will grow by 84 GW, including the increase by 28 GW in 2008-2010. In
2011-2015, the installed capacity of power plants is projected to grow by 56 GW. As a
result, in 2010 the installed capacity of Russia's power plants in the area of centralized
electricity supply will reach 243 GW and 299 GW in 2015.
Based on these projections, a programme was prepared for new generation
capacity additions. The aggregate amount of capacity to be brought on line in 2008-2015 is
91 GW, including 13 GW at NPPs, 13 GW at HPPs, and 65 GW at TPPs.
CAPACITY BALANCE IN THE AREA OF CENTRALIZED ELECTRICITY SUPPLY IN
RUSSIA, GW: Best-Case Scenario*
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
DEMAND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Maximum demand coincident with the UES |
158.7 |
166.1 |
175.1 |
183.2 |
190.6 |
197.3 |
203.9 |
211.1 |
| Exports |
4.9 |
5.4 |
5.7 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
9.2 |
10.0 |
| Calculated design capacity reserve, % |
19.4 |
18.6 |
17.8 |
17.1 |
16.8 |
17.2 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
| Capacity constraints |
18.8 |
18.6 |
19.1 |
18.8 |
18.5 |
18.8 |
18.2 |
19.3 |
| Underused capacity of HPPs |
6,386 |
6,217 |
6,735 |
6,645 |
8,137 |
8,081 |
8,356 |
8,530 |
| TOTAL |
220.6 |
228.2 |
238.9 |
247.2 |
256.6 |
265.2 |
275.0 |
285.6 |
COVERAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Installed Capacity |
218.8 |
227.8 |
243.3 |
257.4 |
271.4 |
278.9 |
288.0 |
299.1 |
| NPPs |
23.9 |
25.5 |
26.7 |
27.8 |
29.9 |
32.2 |
34.5 |
37.9 |
| HPPs |
46.3 |
47.5 |
49.1 |
50.4 |
52.1 |
52.6 |
53.6 |
55.6 |
| TPPs |
148.6 |
154.7 |
167.4 |
179.1 |
189.2 |
193.8 |
199.5 |
205.1 |
| Non-conventional energy sources |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
| Mothballed capacity |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
| Capacity brought on line in Q4 |
0 |
0 |
2.7 |
0 |
2.0 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
2.3 |
| Locked-in capacity |
2.4 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
| Imports |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| TOTAL |
216.5 |
226.2 |
238.3 |
253.7 |
265.9 |
274.3 |
282.4 |
293.4 |
| Actual
capacity reserve, % |
16.9 |
17.4 |
17.3 |
20.5 |
21.6 |
21.6 |
20.3 |
20.4 |
| * Source: APBE |
CAPACITY BALANCE IN THE AREA OF CENTRALIZED ELECTRICITY
SUPPLY IN RUSSIA, GW: Moderate-Case Scenario*
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
DEMAND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Maximum demand coincident with the UES |
156.1 |
161.4 |
168.7 |
175.1 |
181.4 |
187.4 |
193.9 |
200.8 |
| Exports |
4.9 |
5.4 |
5.7 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
9.2 |
10.0 |
| Calculated design capacity reserve, % |
19.6 |
18.9 |
18.1 |
17.5 |
17.3 |
17.6 |
17.1 |
17.2 |
| Capacity constraints |
18.8 |
18.6 |
19.1 |
18.8 |
18.5 |
18.8 |
18.2 |
19.3 |
| Underutilized capacity of HPPs |
6448 |
6327 |
6922 |
6896 |
8432 |
8382 |
8621 |
8673 |
| TOTAL |
217.8 |
223.2 |
232.2 |
238.6 |
247.0 |
254.8 |
264.2 |
274.6 |
COVERAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Installed Capacity |
218.8 |
227.8 |
243.3 |
257.4 |
271.4 |
278.9 |
288.0 |
299.1 |
| NPPs |
23.9 |
25.5 |
26.7 |
27.8 |
29.9 |
32.2 |
34.5 |
37.9 |
| HPPs |
46.3 |
47.5 |
49.1 |
50.4 |
52.1 |
52.6 |
53.6 |
55.6 |
| TPPs |
148.6 |
154.7 |
167.4 |
179.1 |
189.2 |
193.8 |
199.5 |
205.1 |
| Non-conventional energy sources |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
| Mothballed capacity |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
| Capacity brought on line in Q4 |
0 |
0 |
2.7 |
0 |
2.0 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
2.3 |
| Locked-in capacity |
2.7 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
2.6 |
1.6 |
| Imports |
2.0 |
1.1 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| TOTAL |
216.3 |
225.0 |
237.3 |
253.3 |
265.6 |
273.9 |
281.8 |
292.8 |
| Actual
capacity reserve, % |
18.6 |
19.9 |
21 |
25.5 |
27.2 |
27.4 |
25.9 |
26 |
| * Source: APBE |
|
 |